Metallica
5
By Hurford575
Metallica is WAY BETTER THAN KIDZ BOP
Cash grab
2
By lilbear67
Where's the bass? Still the Lars and Hetfield dog and pony show...
Great album
3
By Zombielover1234
I still have the original cassette tape!
And Can’t tell the difference.
But this is my best album out of the first four!🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼
what a joke
2
By jz78817
sounds a bit louder and a tiny bit better than the original release, but still a muddy mess in the bass. if you have the originall 1988 recording then don't waste your money on this release.
Figures...
3
By Pickle Wagon
Still sounds like crap.
Still no bass
2
By ed.the.great
No bass at all. No wonder Newkid eventually left.
Still a tinny piece of crap
1
By MiRaleigh
There is no other reason to re-release this album other than to actually re-mix the thing and bring Jason's bass tracks into the fold. Short of that, it's the same album that sounds like it was recorded in a bag of nails. A cash grab - nothing more.
Still no bass
3
By Cas13axman
No bass
Remastered does not equal Remix
2
By EvinTwin7780
People need to stop complaining that the bass is still gone, however I do agree that this album needed a remix. I still think it’s Metallica’s best album though.
Great Improvement but still lacks Jason’s bass
4
By Neil's Opinion
I gave it 4 out of 5 stars because it’s has more bass..but still lacks Jason’s bass like other Metallica albums.
Overall it’s definitely worth the $25 there asking. The demos alone would have been a $30-$40 import cd 25 years ago at Tower Records.
The remaster overall is truly Awesome! I compared the old vs the remastered versions side by side on a pair of Noise Canceling Bose Headphones on a IPhoneXs. There’s a HUGE difference of sound quality. Especially in the intro, “To Live Is To Die.” The standard version, the guitars sound over-blended together. The remastered version you can almost tell each guitar apart!
Hope this helps, Neil